<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spotify &#8216;back of napkin&#8217; revenue forecast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.thesoundalliance.net/2009/09/25/spotify-back-of-napkin-revenue-forecast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.thesoundalliance.net/2009/09/25/spotify-back-of-napkin-revenue-forecast/</link>
	<description>Just another Sound Alliance Blogs weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 03:57:47 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stig</title>
		<link>http://blog.thesoundalliance.net/2009/09/25/spotify-back-of-napkin-revenue-forecast/comment-page-1/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Stig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 01:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thesoundalliance.net/?p=151#comment-98</guid>
		<description>Napkin or not it&#039;s interesting. My guess is they are simultaneously confident and shitting themselves.

The fact is they are creating a new music consumption paradigm so making confident projection on consumer behaviour is difficult. 

But then the service looks good, works well, is adequately funded and has the majors on board. So they are in a better place than anyone else, while acknowledging that everyone else trying any streaming service either has failed or is in the process of failing.

I just hope they add in better indie music distribution, rev sharing (if their 18% partners don&#039;t mind).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Napkin or not it&#8217;s interesting. My guess is they are simultaneously confident and shitting themselves.</p>
<p>The fact is they are creating a new music consumption paradigm so making confident projection on consumer behaviour is difficult. </p>
<p>But then the service looks good, works well, is adequately funded and has the majors on board. So they are in a better place than anyone else, while acknowledging that everyone else trying any streaming service either has failed or is in the process of failing.</p>
<p>I just hope they add in better indie music distribution, rev sharing (if their 18% partners don&#8217;t mind).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
